The free website to help new writers to develop, and to help talented writers get noticed and published Books
   
tips on which review to delete << Return To Main Site

 Welcome to the YouWriteOn Forum

**2012 News Random House & Orion Editors to continue free reviews of YouWriteOn Top Ten Writers each month  - publishers of many of the world's bestselling authors 

YouWriteOn Authors' Hall of Fame Congratulations to our many authors achieving sales and signings successes through  Waterstones, WHSmith and others! View Hall of Fame
     

YouWriteOn Message Board > Literary Forums > Book Marketing Tips - From Members By Members Help Search Recent Posts
tips on which review to delete
Page 1 Last : 2 > Start New Topic Reply To Topic
michellebeaching
 11 Feb 2011, 11:01 #110644 Reply To Post
Anyone got any advice on this? Is it always best to delete the worst review or does the system discount the ones that are least representative anyway?
Cheers
TJ
He who dares...
is daring.
mkrobinson12
 11 Feb 2011, 11:25 #110647 Reply To Post
Quote: michellebeaching, Friday, 11 Feb 2011 11:01
Anyone got any advice on this? Is it always best to delete the worst review or does the system discount the ones that are least representative anyway?
Cheers
TJ


99% of the time it's best to delete the lowest rated score if you're interested in the rankings and charts. Or if not, then the review that helps the least as far as advice goes. Or none at all and happily accept whatever comes your way. There are many threads on the subject going back a couple of years. Also, another thread today on star ratings in 'It was a dark and stormy night'. Take a quick look at that one.
This post was last edited by mkrobinson12, 11 Feb 2011, 11:27
RobertB
 11 Feb 2011, 11:41 #110649 Reply To Post
Normally the lowest score. The exception is if there's an isolated score. If everyone gives you 3's, 4's and 5's, say, then you get a nasty review with all 1's, the computer will ignore it, and so can you. If you can bear to look at it, that is!
michellebeaching
 11 Feb 2011, 13:34 #110663 Reply To Post

99% of the time it's best to delete the lowest rated score if you're interested in the rankings and charts. Or if not, then the review that helps the least as far as advice goes. Or none at all and happily accept whatever comes your way. There are many threads on the subject going back a couple of years. Also, another thread today on star ratings in 'It was a dark and stormy night'. Take a quick look at that one.


Thanks, mk. Kazmojazz said you were the one who would know!

He who dares...
is daring.
Esta
 13 Feb 2011, 09:45 #110756 Reply To Post
My indigestion is caused by reviewers who make up grammatical rules and quite frankly are ignorant of some common sayings - recently one didn't understand: 'every man jack of us' Duh. And among other dimnesses said you should not introduce direct speech with a colon unless preceded by 'a complete sentence' Duh. Then he told me I shouldn't use a hyphen in a sentence when it was actually a dash. I can deal with the slashers and burners but the inexperienced and frankly ignorant - whow - I've had a couple in the past months and they don't mark low but they do leave me so irritated.
chickin
 13 Feb 2011, 11:55 #110760 Reply To Post
Quote: Esta, Sunday, 13 Feb 2011 09:45
My indigestion is caused by reviewers who make up grammatical rules and quite frankly are ignorant of some common sayings - recently one didn't understand: 'every man jack of us' Duh. And among other dimnesses said you should not introduce direct speech with a colon unless preceded by 'a complete sentence' Duh. Then he told me I shouldn't use a hyphen in a sentence when it was actually a dash. I can deal with the slashers and burners but the inexperienced and frankly ignorant - whow - I've had a couple in the past months and they don't mark low but they do leave me so irritated.


Well, I guess I'm a 'duh' too, as I've never heard of 'every man jack' either.

I am always grateful for help with P & G, even if I don't agree with it. People have gone to the effort of reading and commenting, they don't have to.

The truth is, I'm put off reviewing those who appear ungrateful. My comments may not amount to professional advice, but I am the person who may or may not buy the book. People are free to ignore it, no need to get indigestion or anything else.

I deleted my sig.
Esta
 13 Feb 2011, 15:12 #110774 Reply To Post
Yes duh - Hi - I often come across expressions that are unfamiliar and enjoy widening my vocabulary and knowledge. If you feel grateful to reviewers who toothcomb your piece for so called errors that aren't and don't tackle the nuts and bolts of a piece well feel free. I do not. And I am entitled to say so.
kazmojazz
 13 Feb 2011, 15:51 #110775 Reply To Post
Quote: Esta, Sunday, 13 Feb 2011 15:12
Yes duh - Hi - I often come across expressions that are unfamiliar and enjoy widening my vocabulary and knowledge. If you feel grateful to reviewers who toothcomb your piece for so called errors that aren't and don't tackle the nuts and bolts of a piece well feel free. I do not. And I am entitled to say so.


Perhaps you could put a note at the beginning of your chapters just to say the sort of review that you want, and the sort you don't. Then those of us who are less experienced, or less confident of our reviewing abilities, would know to pass on it, and you'd only get expert reviews.
That way, everybody's happy.
This post was last edited by kazmojazz, 13 Feb 2011, 15:59
chickin
 13 Feb 2011, 20:19 #110799 Reply To Post
Excellent idea Kazz, how about,

“Please don’t comment on the grammar, punctuation or any phrases/sayings that may be unfamiliar to you – just the nuts and bolts of it.”

That should clear it up.
I deleted my sig.
madeinwood
 13 Feb 2011, 22:47 #110819 Reply To Post
Quote: chickin, Sunday, 13 Feb 2011 20:19
Excellent idea Kazz, how about,

“Please don’t comment on the grammar, punctuation or any phrases/sayings that may be unfamiliar to you – just the nuts and bolts of it.”

That should clear it up.


To my mind, anybody who can't use grammar and punctuation correctly shouldn't be writing yet. They should be learning grammar and punctuation. There are plenty of books and websites around to teach them. But why inflict their lack of literacy on the rest of us? I'm happy to try and review the nuts and bolts of it, but if the grammar is wrong and the punctuation inaccurate, the writer isn't going to get a good review from a professional. And it is virtually impossible to find the potential when the foundations are not in place.
If the grammar or punctuation is wrong, I try to explain to the writer where it is going wrong and why - on the assumption he/she doesn't realise. (We're all guilty of not noticing something in our own work).
My personal opinion is - if you can't write properly (and are unwilling to learn), don't make the rest of us suffer - don't submit to YWO. Stay in 'Cloud Cuckoo Land' and play pretend.

This is not to say all writers use grammar and punctuation in the traditional manner. I know there are those who make a point of doing it differently. But like Picasso, those writers first learned how to do it right, before they opted to break the rules.

Getting down off my soapbox now.
Don't tell me the moon is shining; show me the glint of light on broken glass. Anton Chekhov
Page 1 Last : 2 > Add To My Topic Watch List Start New Topic Reply To Topic
Server Time: 25 May 2012, 01:44

Powered by Zarr Forums

5 Database Read(s) - 0.297 seconds

 

Adverts provided by Google and not endorsed by YouWriteOn.com.