The free website to help new writers to develop, and to help talented writers get noticed and published Books
   
New - Random House Reviews - May << Return To Main Site

 Welcome to the YouWriteOn Forum

**2012 News Random House & Orion Editors to continue free reviews of YouWriteOn Top Ten Writers each month  - publishers of many of the world's bestselling authors 

YouWriteOn Authors' Hall of Fame Congratulations to our many authors achieving sales and signings successes through  Waterstones, WHSmith and others! View Hall of Fame
     

YouWriteOn Message Board > The YouWriteOn Forum > The Professional Critiques Forum Help Search Recent Posts
New - Random House Reviews - May
Page 1 Start New Topic Reply To Topic
ProfessionalCritique
 17 May 2010, 11:39 #88932 Reply To Post
Random House are the publisher of bestselling authors such as John Grisham and Terry Pratchett. Each month on YouWriteOn editors from Random House and Orion provide an indepth critique of up to three highly rated YouWriteOn Top Ten novel openings, and mini-reviews of the rest of the top ten stories.

Click here to view the story extract links for the stories reviewed below which are listed under April for 2010

Reviewed this month: The Fish Road to Constantinople, Hibakshu, Lazarus V, The Race
This post was last edited by ProfessionalCritique, 17 May 2010, 19:23
ProfessionalCritique
 17 May 2010, 11:40 #88934 Reply To Post
The Fish Road to Constantinople – MK Robinson


Congratulations on being selected for the YouWriteOn Top Ten this month – I very much enjoyed reading the opening of your story and I can certainly see why it was well reviewed by your fellow writers.

Plot:

The opening of your book is extremely well done – a prologue can be a wonderful way to begin a story and I felt you really seized the opportunity here to set the scene and grab a reader’s attention; I’d defy anyone to not want to immediately carry on reading once they’d finished your final paragraph! There was a very strong sense of narrative pushing your story onwards, which swept me up as a reader and I had a real sense that I was at the beginning of a very original, dramatic story.

You very quickly introduced your core characters, and I think the three children will work well for your story as it allows you to explore different issues. I’m assuming, for example, that Wyn will face very different challenges to Hartha and Eadwulf and that Eadwulf’s foreign background may come to play a part in the story? I wasn’t entirely clear from what you write whether Wyn’s mother had sent her daughter away before the attacks, to try and save her, or whether she’d been sent away for a different purpose. In either case it might be worth clarifying under what circumstances Wyn had last seen her family. I also wondered, as an aside, whether at that time 14 was quite old to remain unmarried? I’m assuming that the average life span was much shorter then and so people would have married and had children much earlier.

Your chapters showcase your skill in creating a sense of place and time and you kept the period details to a very good level, where a reader didn’t need to disrupt their reading to check your glossary but could understand the meaning from the context. I would personally advise against a glossary if possible, as there is sometimes an expectation that a book will be ‘difficult’ if it needs additional explanation, but this is entirely up to you and other readers may feel differently.

Setting

Your setting is a highly original one and I think that unfamiliarity gives you a wonderful opportunity to take your readers on a story that will feel very fresh and new. In historical novels it’s absolutely vital that you convey a sense of period and that comes not just from terminology but the way the characters speak and interact with one another. It can be a tricky balancing act to ensure that your characters don’t sound archaic or too jarringly modern so do bear this in mind as you write. I’d always recommend reading other books set in a similar period to see how other writers have tackled this issue but remember that you should write whatever feels most comfortable to you.

Quality of writing

There were some very striking lines that really captured your narrator’s desolation – ‘our pain made us companions, our heartache made us brothers and sisters’ was one I thought particularly successful as it really helps the readers understand the bonds that must have sprung up so quickly between anyone who survived the attacks.

There were a few points which I felt could benefit from a little re-writing to ensure your meaning is always clear. For example, ‘I recognised the older boy, but not the girl. They were Eadwulf…and Wyn’. If he didn’t know who the girl was then how does he know her name? You need to include a line explaining that they introduced themselves or swapped stories. And I think it might also help your scene-setting to explain how Eadwulf and Wyn had found one another.
One area that I think could benefit from some closer attention is your battle scenes. Action scenes can be very tricky to write because you need to convey a lot of information very quickly so that you don’t lose that sense of action and danger. I would recommend you experiment with using shorter sentences for these scenes as this helps to convey a sense of action, and you initially focus on just explaining what happened as clearly as possible, even just listing the steps involved if you find that helps to concentrate the mind. For example, when the Normans attack the 3 travellers after Wyn leaves the bag, I wasn’t entirely clear what was happening when you wrote that:

‘I leapt, not thinking of anything else to do.

It wasn’t pretty, and a man would’ve made a better job of it, but it worked.’

Does Hartha just throw himself at the rider? Is he trying to just dislodge the rider or attack him? It can be difficult when you can picture a scene so clearly to step back from the story, but it’s important that you focus on creating a very clear image in your readers’ minds. There were a few occasions where I felt that the battle scenes would be more impactful if they were shorter and starker, which would then allow you to concentrate on using more lyrical language in the remainder of your novel.

Characterisation

Because these early chapters are so plot driven we don’t really get much of a sense of Hartha as a character, beyond his understandable rage at what’s happened to his family. I would have loved to have seen a little more conversation between Hartha, Wyn and Eadwulf, or with Ceryl where we got a sense of what Hartha was like before the attacks and what kind of narrator he will prove to be.

Obviously his character will develop throughout the story as he faces new challenges, but I think it would really push your writing onto the next level if you could weave in some other elements of his character so we had a sense, for example, of whether he was a boy who had always longed to travel or if he’d always wanted to stay at home and farm. If we knew a little more about him then it encourages the reader to speculate to themselves as to what he might be feeling when Ceryl urges them to flee to Constantinople – will he be excited? Scared? Determined? – and that makes reading your work a more rewarding process for them.

Conclusion

This is a very promising beginning to your story and I hope that my advice proves helpful and you continue to write and to develop your story. As I mentioned before, your setting felt very fresh and original to me and I can certainly envisage that there would be a clear market for this kind of adventure story.



Hibakshu – Tom Swan

Congratulations on being in the Top Ten this month for what I felt was a well written and very through-provoking story. I liked how you were careful to avoid portraying Dr Petersen as an out and out ‘bad guy’, but created a much more believable, well-rounded character who was forced by what he saw to expand his mental horizons. I was particularly impressed that you resisted any temptation to dwell on the distressing images that they saw in Mr Tanaka’s reflection as I thought your few tightly written lines had a far greater impact than any long descriptions of suffering and torment.
My one query came over his reaction to Mr Tanaka asking whether he knew the story of the sun-goddess. You write that:
‘Dr Petersen felt his stomach sink… This might be important to his mission. This could be useful data’

But I wasn’t quite clear why his stomach would sink if he thought that the story would be of use to him – wouldn’t it only sink if he thought the story was a useless anecdote or a diversionary tactic?

Overall, I thought that this was a very impressive story, and I hope you continue to write.



Lazarus V – Cameron Deco

Congratulations on being chosen as one of the top entries on YouWriteOn! I very much enjoyed reading the opening pages of your book – the beginning in particular was very well judged to intrigue a reader, intriguing and atmospheric. The premise of your story feels very fresh and original and I loved the idea of the US Navy coming to Robert to ask him to use his techniques rather than the more obvious route of Robert pleading with the authorities to be allowed to put his untested theories into practice. Your dialogue in particular was very well judged, and was appropriate to the period without sounding archaic.

Robert is a great central character and you capture his energy, his desire to learn and to succeed perfectly. I can imagine he will be a very appealing protagonist in a full length work. I did want to clarify his age – I had imagined him as still quite a young man but when he’s reflecting on his nightmare he remembers winning a medal at sixteen and wonders ‘twenty years, on, what is it Robert wants?’ This would make him 36 now, and his sister Lilian 31, which surprised me as Lilian is still referred to as ‘a girl’ and I’d have thought that at this point in the twentieth century she would have been married by that age.

Congratulations again, and I hope you continue to write and develop your novel.


This post was last edited by ProfessionalCritique, 17 May 2010, 11:42
ProfessionalCritique
 17 May 2010, 19:26 #88994 Reply To Post
The Race – William McCormick

I thoroughly enjoyed reading the opening half of your story; it had a lovely, light sense of humour that really drew me into your story. Felix and Touissant are both wonderful characters, for very different reasons and the reader is very quickly on Felix’s side. I felt there was almost a touch of PG Wodehouse’s Jeeves and Wooster in their relationship although Touissant is obviously much less appealing than Bertie Wooster!

At times I was surprised that Felix was as outspoken as he was:

‘You know, sometimes when you use irony, Felix, it seems just like a random insult’

‘It’s because you don’t understand irony, sir. Someday I must send you a definition.’

I presume that for Felix to work for a man he hates for twenty years there must be a very good reason why he hasn’t left or found another job – perhaps this is something you could explain in your story? – in which case I was surprised he’d risk being quite so open about his feelings. Touissant is obviously oblivious to much of the undercurrent of Felix’s words but in the example quoted above he’s clearly picked up on some of Felix’s hostility.

My only concern was that the introduction of a more serious note, the reference to the strikes, only comes on page ten and I felt that it would feel less abrupt if this storyline was seeded from the very start of your story, even if it was only a brief mention so it felt fully integrated.

Good luck with your future writing!
mkrobinson12
 17 May 2010, 19:46 #88998 Reply To Post
Thanks to the Random House reviewer of The Fish Road to Constantinople. I feel the reviewer (sorry to keep calling him/her that, but I'm not certain who at Random House wrote this critique) was accurate in their appraisal. Many of the issues mentioned have been on my mind since writing the first few chapters and most of those have been corrected in the last revision (I hope), even if there are many more revisions to go. There were a couple of surprises; one was that he/she really liked the prologue. Many people in my writing club urged me to drop this – glad I didn’t now. All-in-all I’m very pleased and it looks like I need to sit down and do a rewrite, but then again this was a first draft and I knew I’d have to do that anyway. I'm more than happy it's performed as well as it has. I greatly appreciate your advice and comments. Thank you very much for your kind words and taking the time to look at my work.

Michael 'Rob' Robinson

PS: Ted, is it possible to forward my thanks to the Random House person? Also, it would be nice to know who they are. Thanks.
AntCity
 17 May 2010, 23:28 #89025 Reply To Post
Quote: ProfessionalCritique, Monday, 17 May 2010 11:40


Hibakshu – Tom Swan

Congratulations on being in the Top Ten this month for what I felt was a well written and very through-provoking story. I liked how you were careful to avoid portraying Dr Petersen as an out and out ‘bad guy’, but created a much more believable, well-rounded character who was forced by what he saw to expand his mental horizons. I was particularly impressed that you resisted any temptation to dwell on the distressing images that they saw in Mr Tanaka’s reflection as I thought your few tightly written lines had a far greater impact than any long descriptions of suffering and torment.
My one query came over his reaction to Mr Tanaka asking whether he knew the story of the sun-goddess. You write that:
‘Dr Petersen felt his stomach sink… This might be important to his mission. This could be useful data’

But I wasn’t quite clear why his stomach would sink if he thought that the story would be of use to him – wouldn’t it only sink if he thought the story was a useless anecdote or a diversionary tactic?

Overall, I thought that this was a very impressive story, and I hope you continue to write.



Thanks for your review and your comments: much appreciated. Dr Petersen's stomach sank because he wanted the interview to be brief. This is established in the first paragraph. Petersen views Mr Tanaka's diversion into mythology as pointless and has to, not for the only time, dig into his professional training to continue. Thanks again for reading my story.
YouWriteOn
 18 May 2010, 10:54 #89061 Reply To Post
Thanks for the feedback, I'll pass all feedback on to Alison who was the reviewing Editor from Random House this month.
This post was last edited by YouWriteOn, 20 May 2010, 11:28
mkrobinson12
 18 May 2010, 11:05 #89063 Reply To Post
Quote: YouWriteOn, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 10:54
Thanks for the feedback, I'll pass on to Alison who was the reviewing Editor from Random House this month.


Alison who? Please Ted, helpful to know for many reasons. Thanks.

BillMc
 18 May 2010, 15:38 #89084 Reply To Post
Quote: YouWriteOn, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 10:54
Thanks for the feedback, I'll pass on to Alison who was the reviewing Editor from Random House this month.


Please thank Alison for the nice feedback on "The Race."

(Also, sorry for jumping the gun a bit on wondering where my review was.)

Best, Bill
Author of Lenin's Harem: A Novel

McCormick Author Facebook

Goodreads
Page 1 Add To My Topic Watch List Start New Topic Reply To Topic
Server Time: 11 February 2012, 13:21

Powered by Zarr Forums

5 Database Read(s) - 0.313 seconds

 

Adverts provided by Google and not endorsed by YouWriteOn.com.