Random House is the publisher of bestselling authors such as John Grisham and Bill Bryson. Each month on YouWriteOn editors from Random House provide an indepth critique of one highly rated Top Ten novel opening, and 3 mini-reviews of three other top ten stories.
Click here to view the excerpts from the stories below from the YouWriteOn Top Ten lists for 2009Random House Editor's Critique of 13 by Chris TinniswoodDear Chris,
Congratulations on being selected for a professional critique, and well done on a gripping, interesting piece of work. I very much enjoyed reading 13, particularly as I am a children’s fiction editor so it really fell into my area of interest. You have done a great job, and I think all the elements are there for this to be a fantastic story. Mainly my comments concern areas that I think you could make more of and I hope my points are useful to you.
Characters:
You have done a fantastic job of creating two very different and well-drawn characters in Austin and Jordan. I think Jordan’s voice is particularly strong – a great contrast to Austin and a believable thirteen-year-old boy. I do think you could, if you have the space and word count to do so, allow your readers to get to know Jordan even better by showing us more of his reactions and responses to the events of the book.
I’m not completely sure that Austin comes across quite as strongly. I understand that part of this is obviously their characters and personalities, and the fact that Austin’s story is told in third rather than first person, but I do think Austin could do with being slightly less detached from the reader. Allowing us to see more of his personality, thoughts, feelings and reactions might do this. Just a few times, the third person perspective shifts away from Austin as the focus e.g. “Mr Jones stood there for a moment. Austin was not a child to make things up.” and later “yes, they agreed” and I think if you can avoid this, it will also help in allowing your readers to get to know the character you’ve created. We really want readers to care about him and his bullying plight and then later enjoy sharing his time-travelling secret with him, but I struggled with this at times as he seems quite cold, and possibly too formal in his thoughts and speech to be completely appealing. He is our good guy, after all, so we definitely want to be on his side!
Plot:
Your plot is excellent, and the twists and turns you have written are strong and work well. I do think that there are some areas of the story that need to be made clearer or made more prominent. Time travel is a fantastic hook for child readers, and you’ve put your plot in a great setting with a couple of good characters so I personally think that you could make even more of the time-travel element. Your excellently done prologue leads us to believe that the discovery of these ‘holes in time’ are the main focus of the book, but I found them actually getting slightly lost amongst the rivalry between Austin and Jordan, and then brushed over too quickly in the second half of the book with Austin’s back story. I wondered if you thought it might work to take some more time over some of the details of the time travelling and link it back to the prologue?
One way I did think you might be able to do this is if Austin did some research into time travel after he realises what has happened him. This way he could find out some information about holes in time. This would mean it was explained more clearly to your readers, would link the prologue to the main body of the text and show us more of Austin’s response to his discovery. This is obviously only a suggestion, I’m sure you’ve got many ideas of your own!
In the second half of Jordan’s section, when he meets the adult Austin I think that the plot might need slowing down a little. A lot seems to happen, and a lot of time passes in a very short amount of space in the book. I do think that the events suffer and are a little unclear as a result. Time travel and its effects are so fascinating, I think it would be good for your readers to see the huge effect time travelling has had on Jordan.
Drama:
Your writing is excellent throughout and you have crafted some very dramatic moments in 13, the first meeting between the adult Austin and Jordan particularly is very well done but I do think you could afford to make more of the drama throughout the story.
I think it would be great to have more of the drama and immediate action of the moment, and then the physical and mental effects, on both boys when and after they travel through the hole in house number 13, for example. And I also wondered if showing us a little more of the way in which Austin as a child struggles to deal with his discovery might be a good way of adding more drama too. At the moment he’s very quick to accept it and he doesn’t seem to find it either terrifying or brilliant, I think he’s possibly a little too calm!
Structure:
I really liked your prologue, and I think you’ve done a great job of grabbing and intriguing readers immediately. I like the tone and style and the way it’s so direct, it’s a brilliant way to start the book, well done.
I think the main thing I would say about the structure of the story concerns having Austin’s story first and then Jordan’s. I would definitely recommend working the Austin and Jordan narratives alongside each other and weaving them into each other a little more, maybe breaking up the section where Austin is thirteen with chunks of Jordan’s voice rather than having them one at a time. I think I’d also suggest that the narratives went chronologically rather than your readers having to make the big leap forward in time to meet the adult Austin and then the big leap back to meet Jordan. This is obviously again only an idea, but I do I think it could be really intriguing, and would move the plot forward well.
Just a tiny point, but I do think that the leap forward seems very sudden for the reader, they’re suddenly faced with a whole new character in the grown-up Austin. I wonder if a Thirteen years later, or something similar, at the start of the section might make this just a little clearer.
It’s fantastic, but I do think that Jordan’s section feels a little rushed in comparison to the initial set-up and the second leap forward in time in particular happens very quickly. The events in the second half of your story are even more dramatic than the first, and I really think the book would benefit from being slowed down and expanded in this half to show your reader how on earth Jordan copes with all that’s going on.
Format:
I notice that you see the book as a novella now, rather than a short story, and I do think I agree with this decision. I actually think that if you have the time and inclination you have enough plot to slow right down, go into more detail and allow it to become a full-length novel – your writing is certainly strong enough for this.
I do feel that I should just give you a word of warning, the short story area in this age group of the children’s market is a very difficult one. Buyers, retailers and customers are continually looking at value for money and though short stories are a genre of their own, they aren’t particularly popular for this reason. But having said this, yours is a very commercial idea, and I wish you the best of luck with it.
Synopsis:
I do like the extension you’ve suggested at the end of your synopsis, as I said earlier. I think we’d need to get right into the head of Jordan and find out how all the events have affected him, but I’m sure you’d write this additional really well and it intrigues me.
I thought you might be interested to know that we’ve done quite a lot of market research into titles and tag lines. I don’t know if you’ve heard of a book called Room 13 by Robert Swindells? It’s very different to your story, but it is one of Robert’s most successful novels and he is, of course, a great writer, but we do think the title has played its part in the book’s success. So congratulations, I think you have a very intriguing title that will catch readers’ interest and attention!
Critiques continue next post
This post was last edited by ProfessionalCritique, 23 Sep 2009, 22:36